# Why are Europeans snitches. The historical roots of snitching in Europe

Victoria Arden

The general history of snitching in Europe goes back to ancient times, when various mechanisms of control and betrayal arose in society.Political and social circumstances, such as the struggle for power, class struggle and the desire to preserve the status quo, played an important role in this process.In ancient Rome, for example, whistleblowing served as a tool to eliminate political rivals, which contributed to creating an atmosphere of distrust and fear.

© Victoria Arden, 2024

ISBN 978-5-0064-4146-0

Created with Ridero smart publishing system


Why are Europeans snitches

The historical roots of snitching in Europe

## The historical roots of snitching in Europe

The general history of snitching in Europe goes back to ancient times, when various mechanisms of control and betrayal arose in society. Political and social circumstances, such as the struggle for power, class struggle and the desire to preserve the status quo, played an important role in this process. In ancient Rome, for example, whistleblowing served as a tool to eliminate political rivals, which contributed to creating an atmosphere of distrust and fear.

Medieval Europe brought its own nuances to the phenomenon of snitching, especially during the Inquisition and political repression. Here, denunciations were used as a means of controlling the population, which allowed the authorities to identify and punish dissidents. Personalities exposing «enemies of the people» often became heroes, which only exacerbated ethical dilemmas.

In more modern conditions, starting with the revolutionary movements of the XVIII century and ending with the totalitarian regimes of the XX century, snitching adapted to new realities. In the conditions of war and political crises, it played a decisive role in manipulating public opinion and suppressing the opposition. The tradition of whistleblowing, which had an impact on public relations, eventually formed resistance and negative perception among the population, maintaining its relevance even in our time.

With the advent of industrialization and the growth of the urban population, institutionalized snitching became even more widespread. In the 19th century, special police forces arose that used denunciations to maintain order and suppress the labor movement. This wave of repression led many people to perceive informants as traitors, which further deepened the division in society.

In the 20th century, with the establishment of totalitarian regimes such as Nazi Germany and the Stalinist Soviet Union, snitching became systemic. Here it became an instrument of mass terror, where denunciations were used to destroy real and imaginary enemies of the regime. Informants often acted out of fear, a desire to please the authorities, or for personal gain, creating an atmosphere of paranoia and distrust in society.

Modern societies, despite democratic values, still face questions about the boundaries of whistleblowing. In the context of globalization and new technologies, snitching takes other forms, for example, in the form of anonymous complaints on the Internet. This creates new ethical dilemmas related to privacy, security and human rights, keeping the problem relevant today.


## Overview of the topic of snitching in the European context

Snitching, or snitching, in the European context has a long and complex history, reflecting social, political and cultural changes over the centuries. In different historical eras, informers have played various roles: from instruments of repression in totalitarian regimes to activists seeking to expose corruption and crimes. In the context of modern democracies, snitching often causes disputes about moral responsibility and civic duty.

In countries with established democratic traditions, such as Norway or Sweden, informers are sometimes seen as defenders of the public interest, especially in cases involving corruption or government misconduct. However, in such societies there is also a cultural negativity towards snitching, which can lead to the social isolation of informers. Here, informers are often motivated by fear or personal gain, which undermines trust in society and creates an atmosphere of distrust and paranoia. Thus, snitching in Europe remains a multi-layered and controversial topic that requires analysis and reflection depending on the context.

In countries with developing democratic institutions, snitching can take forms that range from attempts to fight corruption to the desperation of individual citizens seeking to survive in conditions of political instability. Here, whistleblowing is often seen as a difficult game where personal moral choices may face the need to protect their interests or the interests of their family.

In countries with tight controls, such as Hungary, there is a paradox: at the level of official policy, whistleblowing can be encouraged as a way to strengthen power, but fear of condemnation persists among the population. This creates double standards when people may not openly support whistleblowing, but act differently in a personal context, which undermines social ties and leads to a general atmosphere of distrust.

Ultimately, discussing the topic of snitching in Europe requires an interdisciplinary approach that takes into account historical roots, social contexts and cultural differences. Each society defines the boundaries between the norms of civil responsibility and betrayal in its own way, which generates a continuous dialogue about the limits of moral choice under pressure.


## Modern examples of snitching in Europe

Modern snitching in Europe manifests itself in various forms and contexts, from domestic to political. One striking example is the use of anonymous complaints against neighbors about public order violations, such as noise or inciting conflict. This can lead to tension in the community and increase the atmosphere of distrust.

In the political sphere, snitching is also actively used as a tool to combat corruption. For example, in some countries, such as Germany and the Netherlands, there are programs encouraging citizens to report illegal activities to government agencies. These measures often provoke public debate about the boundaries of moral duty and personal responsibility.