# History from the Zero. Post metamodernism. + CONSTRUCTIVE POSTMODERN / METAMODERN TRANSFORMATIONS Introduction 2017–2018

Viktoriia Managarova

The essay raises a new vision of the final End in postmodern state, emerging through the crisis of dominants in current tendencies of metamodernism by T. Vermeulen, R. van den Akker. Despite this, making one well-directed step back, metamodernism found the valid key, oscillating with the shades of goodness for holistic happiness to open the gates of The Brilliant Age. This journey turned out to be long, overcoming 2018 years to discover the new world island of post metamodernism without evil.

# History from the Zero. Post metamodernism. + CONSTRUCTIVE POSTMODERN / METAMODERN TRANSFORMATIONS Introduction 2017—2018. Viktoriia Managarova

© Viktoriia Managarova, 2019


ISBN 978-5-4496-9967-1

Created with Ridero smart publishing system

> In 2015—2017 the basic meanings of this text were presented for the first time to the philosopher Robin van den Akker ( Erasmus University Rotterdam), co-author of the concept of metamodernism; to the philosophers Svetlana Krylova and Nazip Khamitov (Grigory Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine), the authors of the concept of meta-anthropology (2017—2018).

> On June 11, 2019, the full version of the paper was approved for independent release by Jacob Lund, Associate professor ( Aarhus University, School of Communication and Culture ) with reccomendations to clarify the aim of the research in the

> next future.

## Dedicated to my beloved world, my King, my Baby and the best friend. Love you and Thank you for your life


## HISTORY FROM THE ZERO. POST METAMODERNISM[1] + constructive postmodern/ metamodern transformations INTRODUCTION 2017—2018 VIKTORIIA MANAGAROVA

> The age of the sign is essentially theological[2]

> J. Derrida

### ABSTRACT

The essay raises a new vision of the final End in postmodern condition, emerging through the crisis of dominants in current tendencies of metamodernism by Timotheus Vermeulen and Robin van den Akker, demonstrating also the impossibility of projecting the future of humanity, doomed endlessly to pursue the vanishing horizon. Despite this, making one well-directed step back, metamodernism found the valid key, oscillating with the shades of goodness for holistic happiness to open the gates of The Brilliant Age. This journey turned out to be long, overcoming 2018 years to discover the new world island of post metamodernism without evil. And this, of course, is not a mirage. This is the new sincere philosophy from the zero to demonstrate an obvious optimism and to open the last station for humanity, revealing the prospect of a beautiful and unbroken eternity of peace and harmony for everybody.


KEYNOTES


postmodernism, metamodernism, post metamodernism

## THE GREAT END IN POSTMODERN STATE

THE SEQUENCE OF OUTBREAKS OF THE LAST CENTURIES

LED TO THE GREAT END IN POSTMODERN STATE.

IT FINALLY CUT OFF ALL CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PAST

AND FUTURE. THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MINUS AND PLUS WERE ERASED. TIME DEMONSTRATED ELUSIVE FRAMES. TIME DEMONSTRATED AN INVISIBLE HUMAN FACE.

> «Good is no longer the opposite of evil,

> nothing can now be plotted on a graph or analyzed in terms of abscissas and ordinates».[3]

In this boundless space of total indifference Love has lost its sources and the world divided into a state of unlimited “emptiness”[4]

The greatness of prior sense were thrown away in various random directions. And cold irony spread around its parts through different islands.

> «Indeed, we should really no longer speak of «value» at all,

> for this kind of propagation or chain reaction makes all valuation impossible.

> Once again we are put in mind of microphysics: it is as impossible to make estimations between beautiful and ugly, true and false…»[5]

The planet seemed to be reduced to the size of a small point.

And a new historical chapter should have started from that moment.

### HOWEVER, WHAT STORY COULD BE WRITTEN FROM NULL?

COULD THE WORLD HISTORY CONTINUE IN PRINCIPLE AFTER THE BIG END OF ALL THINGS? IN WHICH DIRECTION SHOULD EACH HUMAN PASS WITHOUT AN ABSOLUTE DOMINANT IN THE HEART?

The weave of “Rhizome”[6] made
the existence of any centre impossible.

“Grand narratives”[7] were ruined.

Everything descended into “deconstruction”[8],
mocking all culture in numerous
anachronistic shifts.

#### ARTIFICIAL MIND

Artist George Condo[9] created a clown-animal hybrid, displacing Man as a biological entity in his creative interpretation.

John Currin’s[10] depictions of the Man represented the abject state.

We see people with pitchers and boots on heads that turned off themselves as living race. These creatures are floating along the current time without resistance and do not have any strength to move the history forward.

Matthew Barney[11] changed his own existence to the existence of “a sheep”.

Artist Tracey Emin[12] married a stone, because of systematic men’s disloyalty in her life.

Postmodern opened human as fiction in all his/her manifestations and made a global  “body without organs”.[13]

J.Baudrillard notes that “the body was a metaphor for the soul” [14]in the past, then it was a metaphor for gender
but today it is “no longer a metaphor for anything at all”[15].
Artificial intelligence has become a new trend, denying alive mind.

Marvin Minsky created “The Emotion Machine”.[16]

In 2015 the cultural “icon” Robot Sophia was presented as a genius mechanism to the world by ex-worker of Disney company Dr. David Hanson for Hanson Robotics.

In 2017 Saudi Arabia granted citizenship[17] to a robot for the first time ever.

Posthuman got a crown to be a leader of the future as a mutant which would be woven of blood and wires, forming

> «the new age of spiritual machines»[18],

according to R. Kurzweil.

However, what kind of spirituality can be obtained by a machine created under the control of an imperfect human mind?

Robots cannot imitate fineness, which does not exist.
But robots will be able to escape from the control of imperfection and then mankind will become really vulnerable in this technical war.

This paradoxical situation described Isaak Azimov following Industrial transformations in the middle of the 20th century.
He created three laws of robotics in his fantastic tale “I, Robot”.[19]

According to the first and the main law, a robot must protect a human being. However, the robot that has reached a higher level of development came to the conclusion, that people must be destroyed, because they were not worthy to be leaders of Nature.

Jos de Mul in the book “Romantic Desire in (Post) modern art and philosophy” sees a direct connection between the form of emptiness of Nietzsche’s “Übermensch”, existing beyond good and evil, and between the emptiness of real life in postmodern situation, generating the concept of posthuman that reveals the end of biological life on planet.

> «… the ideal of «overcoming man’ plays a persistent role in the Romantic tradition. However, even in Nietzsche’s radical prophesy of the Übermensch the «overcoming’ aims at another type of man and not so much at his extinction. Similarly, in the postmodern prophesy of the «death of man’ (cf.Foucault,1974) this death does not concern man as species, but a specific metaphysical conception of man. Moravec’s vision can be conceived of as a fundamental radicalization of the Romantic prophesy insofar he predicts a real end of the life of the species Homo sapiens. It radicalizes Nietzsche’s idea that man only is a rope, stretched between ape and Übermensch. In Moravec’s vision this Übermensch will be build not out of carbon, but out of silicon instead».[20]

### SO, WHY HAVE HISTORY OF MAN STOPPED?

WHY HAVE MAN DISAPPEARED FROM HISTORY?

The idea of disappearance of Man is connected precisely with the fact that Man could not exist beyond the line where God cannot exist.

The existence of God with Man is real inside the boundaries which begin with words woven into culture.
There is neither culture nor Man without the right words.
That is why it is important to have a metatext that can form the main valid dominant of true life of human.
With the Beginning of the Age of Enlightenment, God losing his presence in reality until he finally turned into fiction in the 19th century.

In recent modern times thinkers had started to spend all their energy to find new forms without strong values, demonstrating flat meanings (some discourses later) without the ability to realize the wholeness, forming the problem of “authors without literature”.[21]

> «What modernity allows us to read in the plurality of modes of writing, is the blind alley which is its own History».[22]

This total inflation of texts achieved the mark of zero (“writing degree zero” according to Ronald Bart), erasing a real “author”[23], creating new dispassionate standards of journalism for numerous manipulations.

Herbert Marcuse saw “One-Dimensional Man”[24] in a new mass society without volume sense. This Man ceased to recognize the plus and minus in the structure of total freedom, that revealed a pluralistic lie as dominant.

In fact, the choice in such a quantity of superficial
meanings is impossible.

Jean Baudrillard described the end of the social and the birth of a homogeneous impenetrable cold mass in postmodern structure.

> «The mass is only mass because its social energy has already frozen.

> It is a cold reservoir, capable of absorbing and neutralizing any hot

> energy».[25]

This mass was dissolved in the “transparency of evil” (J.Baudrillard) without the ability to see the truth.

So, evil has become transparent and human was also not able to see Goodness. He/She was dipped into chaos and lost in it as a small idle “mechanism”.[26]


IN THIS WAY POSTMODERN GENERATED A STATE OF TOTAL NULL FOR HUMANITY

But only the Man who came out from the all-consuming mass of rhizome could realize that state of null. Only that Man who entered the new island; only that Man who was alive.

## “New Sincerity”. METAMODERNISM

In the early 21st century “New Sincerity”[27] cleared up the space of cold irony. And one drop of light suddenly clarified the former gloom.

In one functional point, the past and the present came into contact, which opened “both-neither”

# Примечания

1

For the first time the term “post metamodernism’ (“after- metamodernism’) was published in a short essay in the author’s book with world record poems “Бриллиантовый век” (The Brilliant Age), See V. Managarova. The Brilliant Age, Publishing House of Dmitry Burago, 2015, 15—24 (rus).

2

(The age of the sign is essentially theological) See J. Derrida, “Of Grammatology’, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997, 14.

3

J.Baudrillard. The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena (Verso, 2009),6.

4

Here it is important to note the book of G. Lipovetsky “Era of emptiness’, which characterizes the space of postmodernism most expressively in this context. See: Lipovetsky G. (2001), Era of Emptiness: An Essay on Modern Individualism, Vladimir Dal Publ., Saint Petersburg, 336 (rus).

5

J.Baudrillard. The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena (Verso, 2009),6.

6

G.Deleuze, F.Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987 (Introduction: Rhizome), 3—25.

7

J-F Lyotard. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Machester University Press, 1984, 144 pp.

8

See J. Derrida, “Of Grammatology’, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997, 360 pp.

9

G. Condo, Artworks. See https://www.artsy.net/artist/george-condo

10

See selected art of J. Currin: The Guardian, Art and design, November 25, 2016, «John Currin review – meta-painter dances on the knife edge of taste’, https://www.theguardian.com/…/john-currin-review-sadie…

11

See the sheep face of M.Barney: http://www.itsliquid.com/featured-artist-matthew-barney.html

12

The Guardian, «Stoned love: why Tracey Emin married a rock’ https://www.theguardian.com/…/tracey-emin-married-rock…

13

G.Deleuze, F.Guattari. “ANTI-EDIPUS Capitalism and Schizophrenia’, University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, 1983, 8—16.

14

J.Baudrillard.The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena (Verso, 1993), 7.

15

Ibid.

16

M.Minsky.The emotional machine. Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind (Simon & Schuster, 2006), 373 pp.

17

A.Griffin, Indy/Tech, «Saudi Arabia Grants Citizenship to a robot forthe first time ever’, October 26, 2017. https://www.independent.co.uk/…/saudi-arabia-robot

18

R. Kurzweil. The Age of Spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence (Viking Press, 1999), 400 pp.

19

I.Asimov. I, Robot (Spectra, 1991), 304 pp.

20

J. de Mul. Romantic desire in (post) modern art and philosophy (State University of New York Press, 1999), 244.

21

R.Bart. Writing Degree zero (Hill and Wang, 1970), 61.

22

Ibid., 61.

23

See M. Foucault,“What is an author’ (text of a lecture presented to the Societé Francais de philosophie on 22 February 1969). https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/pluginfile.php/624849/mod_resource/content/1/a840_1_michel_foucault.pdf

24

H.Marcuse. One-Dimentional Man, Routledge Classics,2002,275pp.

25

J.Baudrillard. In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities… Or the End of the Social (Semiotext (e)), 1983, 26.

26

J.Baudrillard.The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena (Verso, 1993), 7.

27

Between Irony and Sincerity. Timotheus Vermeulen and Robin van den Akker In conversation with Jimenez Lai and Sarah Dunn, Apr 6, 2018, New York, Discussion. https://www.arch.columbia.edu/events/809-between-irony-and-sincerity